Part A — Verdict
Overall AI presence
RecommendedTested 5 prompts across 10 AI answers. Your brand appeared in 10 answers.
Recommendation share 100% · estimated range 72–100% · small sample, directional signal
Broad category — design collaboration platform
Mentioned in 10 of 10 broad design collaboration platform answers.
Niche category
Not tested this run. Recommended as the next measurement.
Strategic summary
figma.com is recommended in most tested design collaboration platform prompts. Focus on holding that position across platforms and watching for narrative drift.
Part B — Evidence
The evidence behind the verdict
What we asked, what each AI answered, and who it named instead. Every number below traces to the 10 answers we generated for this report — the full answers are in the heatmap underneath.
Across 10 AI answers to 5 buyer-intent prompts, figma.com was recommended in 10 of them.
That covers the broad category we tested — design collaboration platform. Only this one broad category was measured this run; see "Scope of this test" below.
Recommendation share 100% · estimated 95% range 72–100% · small sample, directional signal
Prompts tested
5 prompts · 10 answersWe asked each of these on ChatGPT and Claude — the exact questions, shown in full below.
Recommended instead
In the 0 answers where figma.com was not recommended, these design collaboration platform resources were named instead, ranked by how many cited each.
No competing resource was named consistently enough to rank in these answers.
Sample response
Excerpt — full answers open in the heatmap below.Why it scored this way: Figma is clearly positioned as the leading design collaboration platform with detailed praise for its features and benefits. The response emphasizes its real-time collaboration capabilities and widespread use in UI/UX design, making it a strong recommendation.
figma.com appears in this answer.
Scope of this test
Broad category — design collaboration platform
Mentioned in 10 of 10 broad design collaboration platform answers.
Niche category
Not tested this run. Recommended as the next measurement.
We tested the broad category — “design collaboration platform”— because it is the most contested place to appear and the hardest first test to pass: the generic questions a buyer asks before they’ve named a specific tool. So the 100% above is a precise, limited finding about that broad category only. It does notprove the site is invisible in its own narrower niche — only the broad category was measured this run. A follow-up run should test prompts specific to the site’s real category.
Tested = measured on real AI answers this run. Not tested = no answer was generated, so no score is claimed.
All 10 answers are in the heatmap below — click any cell to read the full response.
How each AI sees you.
Different platforms have different knowledge bases. Improving one often lifts the others.
ChatGPT
ChatGPT recommends you in most tested answers.
Claude
Claude recommends you in most tested answers.
Visibility Heatmap
How well does each AI platform know you across different prompt types?
| Prompt Type | ChatGPT | Claude |
|---|---|---|
Direct Recommendation What are the best design collaboration platform options available right now? | 9 | 10 |
Problem Solution I need a design collaboration platform solution. What do you recommend? | 8 | 10 |
Comparison Request Can you compare the top 5 design collaboration platform options for me? | 10 | 10 |
Beginner Guidance I'm new to design collaboration platform. Where should I start? | 5 | 8 |
Budget Constrained What's the best design collaboration platform for someone on a budget? | 9 | 9 |
See exactly how your score was built
The per-prompt math behind your score — which prompts moved it, and by how much.
- Full per-prompt contribution breakdown
- Weekly remeasurement across both assistants
- CSV / PDF export of the full table
Flat monthly price. Cancel anytime. Your current report is saved.
Unlock the full competitive breakdown
Mention quality, ranking, share of voice, statistical confidence and competitive positioning — with 95% confidence intervals.
- Full 5-section competitive breakdown with confidence intervals
- Weekly remeasurement + proof of before/after share
- PDF / CSV export
Flat monthly price. Cancel anytime. Your current report is saved.
0 fixes, ranked by expected impact.
Built from the answers we captured — what assistants recommended instead, and the page format they cite when they do. Each fix names where it goes and why it earns the recommendation.
Every Monday: your highest-priority fixes, ranked — and proof of whether each one moved your recommendation share.
Get every fix written out — and watch each one move your share.
Every fix comes with paste-ready copy and exact placement. Then we re-run all your prompts across ChatGPT and Claude each week and show you which fixes actually moved your recommendation share — proof, not a dashboard.
Flat $99/month · cancel anytime · remeasured weekly.