Part A — Verdict
Overall AI presence
RecommendedTested 5 prompts across 10 AI answers. Your brand appeared in 10 answers.
Recommendation share 100% · estimated range 72–100% · small sample, directional signal
Broad category — collaborative design tool
Mentioned in 10 of 10 broad collaborative design tool answers.
Niche category
Not tested this run. Recommended as the next measurement.
Strategic summary
figma.com is recommended in most tested collaborative design tool prompts. Focus on holding that position across platforms and watching for narrative drift.
Part B — Evidence
The evidence behind the verdict
What we asked, what each AI answered, and who it named instead. Every number below traces to the 10 answers we generated for this report — the full answers are in the heatmap underneath.
Across 10 AI answers to 5 buyer-intent prompts, figma.com was recommended in 10 of them.
That covers the broad category we tested — collaborative design tool. Only this one broad category was measured this run; see "Scope of this test" below.
Recommendation share 100% · estimated 95% range 72–100% · small sample, directional signal
Prompts tested
5 prompts · 10 answersWe asked each of these on ChatGPT and Claude — the exact questions, shown in full below.
3 additional calls errored and are excluded from every count above.
Recommended instead
In the 0 answers where figma.com was not recommended, these collaborative design tool resources were named instead, ranked by how many cited each.
No competing resource was named consistently enough to rank in these answers.
Sample response
Excerpt — full answers open in the heatmap below.Why it scored this way: Figma is clearly positioned as the top choice for collaborative design tools, with specific features and benefits outlined that emphasize its superiority. The response dedicates a significant portion to praising Figma, making it the clear leader among the options listed.
figma.com appears in this answer.
Scope of this test
Broad category — collaborative design tool
Mentioned in 10 of 10 broad collaborative design tool answers.
Niche category
Not tested this run. Recommended as the next measurement.
We tested the broad category — “collaborative design tool”— because it is the most contested place to appear and the hardest first test to pass: the generic questions a buyer asks before they’ve named a specific tool. So the 100% above is a precise, limited finding about that broad category only. It does notprove the site is invisible in its own narrower niche — only the broad category was measured this run. A follow-up run should test prompts specific to the site’s real category.
Tested = measured on real AI answers this run. Not tested = no answer was generated, so no score is claimed.
All 10 answers are in the heatmap below — click any cell to read the full response.
Part C — Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Why AI assistants are underrepresenting your brand
You perform well on some AI platforms but are largely invisible on others. Training data and knowledge cut-offs vary by model.
ChatGPT: 100% vs Perplexity: 0% — 100 point gap.
How each AI sees you.
Different platforms have different knowledge bases. Improving one often lifts the others.
ChatGPT
ChatGPT recommends you in most tested answers.
Claude
Claude recommends you in most tested answers.
Visibility Heatmap
How well does each AI platform know you across different prompt types?
| Prompt Type | ChatGPT | Claude |
|---|---|---|
Direct Recommendation What are the best collaborative design tool options available right now? | 10 | 9 |
Problem Solution I need a collaborative design tool solution. What do you recommend? | 9 | 10 |
Comparison Request Can you compare the top 5 collaborative design tool options for me? | 9 | 10 |
Beginner Guidance I'm new to collaborative design tool. Where should I start? | 7 | 5 |
Budget Constrained What's the best collaborative design tool for someone on a budget? | 9 | 9 |
See exactly how your score was built
The per-prompt math behind your score — which prompts moved it, and by how much.
- Full per-prompt contribution breakdown
- Weekly remeasurement across both assistants
- CSV / PDF export of the full table
Flat monthly price. Cancel anytime. Your current report is saved.
Unlock the full competitive breakdown
Mention quality, ranking, share of voice, statistical confidence and competitive positioning — with 95% confidence intervals.
- Full 5-section competitive breakdown with confidence intervals
- Weekly remeasurement + proof of before/after share
- PDF / CSV export
Flat monthly price. Cancel anytime. Your current report is saved.
0 fixes, ranked by expected impact.
Built from the answers we captured — what assistants recommended instead, and the page format they cite when they do. Each fix names where it goes and why it earns the recommendation.
Every Monday: your highest-priority fixes, ranked — and proof of whether each one moved your recommendation share.
Get every fix written out — and watch each one move your share.
Every fix comes with paste-ready copy and exact placement. Then we re-run all your prompts across ChatGPT and Claude each week and show you which fixes actually moved your recommendation share — proof, not a dashboard.
Flat $99/month · cancel anytime · remeasured weekly.